PAUL BEFORE FELIX
Dr. W. A. Criswell
Acts 24:1-26
2-11-79 10:50 a.m.
So once again thank you, wonderful choir and orchestra and Larry Walker, an
evangelist who plays the violin so beautifully. And once again, God bless
the eyes that watch this televised appeal. And the Lord bless the ears
that listen to this service on radio. You’re sharing with us the services of
the First Baptist Church in Dallas. And this is the pastor bringing the
morning message entitled Paul Before Felix.
I might say before I begin,
this is the first evening, at seven o’clock tonight, that we begin that series
of sermons that are your favorite. Last year for sixteen consecutive
Sunday nights, I preached the sermons that were my favorites. They were
published in a book entitled With a Bible in My Hand. And then I
thought this year, each one of the divisions—and there are fourteen of them—could
choose a sermon they especially liked. And then for 14 consecutive
evenings, I would try to deliver those messages. So today is the
divisional group of our singles. And they have chosen a passage in 1
Corinthians: “For all things are yours, whether life or death, things present,
things to come. All things are yours.” And that will be the sermon
tonight. And then each Sunday night for 14 weeks there will be a message
chosen by each one of the divisions of our church.
Now the message this hour: we are preaching through the Book of Acts. And
the latter part of this book moves very rapidly, following the journey of the
apostle Paul as a prisoner to be tried before the Roman Caesar in Rome.
Now in the twentieth chapter of the Book of Acts, we were listening to Paul as
he talked to the Ephesian elders. And then kneeling down and praying,
they kissed each other and with many tears, bade each other farewell. In
the twenty-first chapter of the Book of Acts, Paul comes to Jerusalem for the
last time and his visit there ends in a riot. He is seized in the temple
area and they are beating him to death. And just north of the temple area
is the Roman garrison. They are situated in the Tower of Antonio that
overlooks the temple court.
So the Roman soldiers come down and rescue the apostle. He makes himself
known to the chiliarch, Claudius Lysias, the head of the Roman
contingent in Jerusalem. And he asked the Roman chiliarch if he
could speak to the maddening throng below. And when Lysias understands
him to be a Roman citizen, and sees that he is a man of education and culture,
he allows Paul to address that great throng beneath him; speaking as he does
from the steps of the Tower of Antonio. And when he begins to speak in
the Hebrew language, they listen to him all the more intently.
Now that’s chapter 22, but that also ends in a riot. So in chapter 23, the
apostle is brought before the Sanhedrin for Claudius Lysias to understand why
it is that there is such tumult and riot created by this man Paul. Well
the same thing happened in the Sanhedrin, it also ended in a tumult and in a
riot. And Claudius Lysias is nonplused by the technicalities, and the
legalities, and the detail of what to do with this man who creates such violent
opposition.
Claudius Lysias, the chiliarch, learns that there is a conspiracy to murder
Paul. So he sends him—in the twenty-third chapter—he sends him down to
Caesarea, the Roman capitol of the province of Judea, in order that he be tried
before the procurator of the province, whose name is Felix. And you
have a good indication of the volatile nature of the country when you read here
in the twenty-third chapter that there are 470 men, soldiers, who are seeing to
it that he is accompanied safely into Caesarea—200 soldiers, foot soldiers, 200
spear men and 70 cavalry men—just for the safe keeping of one man to be
presented before the procurator.
Claudius Lysias, the chiliarch, that is the leader of a thousand Roman
legionnaires, writes a letter to Felix, the Roman procurator. And when
Felix reads the letter, why he says: “When your accusers come down from
Jerusalem, then I will hear the case.”
“So after five days”—and now we have come to our chapter 24, out of which is
brought the message at this hour—“after five days…” while the trial is held in
the Roman praetorian in Caesarea”—and we’re going to present, first of all, the
characters who appear in this twenty-fourth chapter of the Book of Acts.
When you read a Shakespearean play, up there at the first will be the dramatist
persona, the characters of the play. And then they are introduced.
We are going to introduce them as they appear in this twenty-fourth chapter of
the Book of Acts. First of all Ananias—“And after five days Ananias the high
priest descended with the elders…”—Now we have met him in the previous chapter,
in chapter 23, when Paul stood before the Sanhedrin. The first sentence
he [Paul] said was—“I have lived in all good faith and all good conscience
before God…”
And when he said that
Ananias, the high priest, commanded those who were standing near him to smite
him on the mouth. And Paul, in a blaze of indignation, turned toward him
and said: “God shall smite thee, thou white-washed wall.”
And those who stood by
said: “Revilest God’s high priest so?
And Paul replied: “I did
not realize he was the high priest…”
Now that is the first appearance of Ananias. Now, the second one is here,
when he comes before the Roman procurator in the praetorian to accuse the
apostle face to face. Now this Ananias is described in great detail by
Josephus. Josephus says he was a typical Sadducee: haughty, imperious, contumacious,
wealthy, using his office for personal gain. He was sent by the legate of
Syria, who controlled all of that part of the Roman Empire, to Rome in 52 A.
D.; there to answer for his life because of cruelty and injustice. But
Claudius Caesar acquitted him when others intervened in his behalf before the
court. So he was sent back to Judea and to his office of high
priest. He was an unscrupulous man. He murdered his enemies.
But when Paul said to him: “God shall smite thee thou white washed wall,” he
was a prophet. In the insurrection of the Jewish nationalists against
Rome, the first thing they did was to hunt out and to hunt down Ananias and to
murder him. Now that is the high priest Ananias, who is come before the
court to accuse Paul.
Now, the next one introduced here: “Ananias… came with the elders, and with a
certain orator named Tertullus…” Now, that’s a Roman name: “Tertullus.”
And we suppose he is a Roman but not necessarily so. “Paul” is a praenomen,
Roman name; “Paul.” It’s a Roman-Latin word meaning “small” or “little,” “Paul,”
“Paulus”.
So this Tertullus is an
orator, maybe a Jew, maybe a Roman; but he has been hired to debase, and to defame,
and to prosecute the apostle. And of course, being learned in the
forensics of the court, he prepares it in order to present benefit to the Roman
judge.
Now, the next one named here is the governor: Ananias, then Tertullus—the paid
orator and accuser—and then Felix, the governor, the procurator. Out of
all of the characters that I have ever read about in Roman history, I don’t
think there is one more venal, or base, or despicable than this man,
Felix. Where he came from was: Antonia, the mother of the emperor Claudius
Caesar, had two slaves—brothers, one was named Pallas and one was named Felix—and
those two brothers, in a chicanery, in a shrewd deception that would have done
justice to Judas Iscariot, they elevated themselves in the court at Rome and
became favorites of the queen mother and of the Roman Caesar himself.
So they were manumitted; they were freed. And as freed men, they advanced
rapidly and marvelously in the imperial city. They became two of the
richest men in the empire. And Pallas was the favorite of Caesar; he
pandered to his master’s vices. One of the men in the court said to
Claudius Caesar, when the emperor complained of being poor, he said to him: “Well,
you be a partner with Felix and Pallas and you will be a rich man like them.”
Maybe he said that in irony or in jest, but full many a truth in jest is
made. These two slaves have marvelously risen in power and influence in
the imperial court in Rome. So while Pallas stays in Rome, the favorite of
the Caesar, Felix, is appointed procurator of the Roman province of Judea and
here he is.
Now he uses his office for the purpose of collecting bribes. He is
rapacious and greedy; for example, at the end of the chapter it says that this
Felix hoped that money should have been given of Paul that he might loose
him. Not a matter of Roman law or worthy acquittal but a matter of
bribery. I suppose that he thought Paul had a great deal of money because
in the seventeenth verse Paul says in his defense: “After many years, I came to
bring alms to my nation, and offerings.” So Felix thinks that Paul has a
great deal of money. Therefore he offers to liberate him—acquit him—if he’ll
buy his freedom; that is Felix using his office for personal gain and wealth. Tacitus,
the great Roman historian, speaks of this Felix in supreme contempt. I
copied two sentences out of history. He says Felix reveled in cruelty and
lust, and wielded the power of a king with the mind of a slave. And then
Tacitus said again about him: He exercised in Judea the imperial functions with
a mercenary soul.
Now it is before that judge, that procurator that Paul stands to be tried for
his life. So Tertullus begins to accuse him. And after
complimenting in worthy adulating words, brilliant, beautiful words addressed
the most noble Felix with all thankfulness, then he begins. So he says, “Notwithstanding,
that I be not further tedious in thee, I pray thee that you hear me of thy
clemency…We have found this man—Paul—we have found this man—and the King James
Version is here—a pestilent fellow…” Now, when you look at that, the “a” and
the “fellow” are in italics. That is, they are not in the original.
Now, what this orator said in his first sentence was: “We have found this man, loimos”
And loimos, when you take it over into Latin is pestes. And
when you take it over into English it is “pestilent,” it is “plague! “We
have found this man, plague, leprous; wherever he touches, wherever he goes he
sows discontent, and disorder, and discord. And that’s the first thing
that he says about him—just like that—loimos.
Well, what do you think about that? We have been following Paul now for
several months and this is the man who preaches the gospel of the grace of the
Son of God. This is the man who prays with many tears with the people. Tthis
is the man who is trying to win, out of the judgment of sin and death, these
who would find life in the Lord Jesus, our Christ. Nothing in him have we
ever found that even began—or remotely—to approach that word “loimos.”
Well, it is interesting to see what the orator says about this man Paul, and
all of those that were with him assented, saying that these things were
so.
All right, the next thing he says about him, “He is a mover of sedition among
all of the Jews throughout the world.” Now what a remarkable thing that
is. Of course the orator had in his mind immediately he would get the ear
of the procurator in calling him an insurrectionist, because the government of
the Roman Empire lay in its power, in its quietness. And “insurrection”
was a blasphemous word, just to name it. And so this man, Paul, is
accused of being an insurrectionist, a seditionist among all Jewry throughout
the world.
Now, that’s an amazing thing for us. Did you know when I was down there
at the inauguration of the governor of the state of Texas, William Clements;
one of the men in the service was an Episcopal priest. And his assignment
was to read the Bible, the scripture passage. And what he read was a
passage from the apostle Paul. He read the first part of the thirteenth
chapter of the Book of Romans:
Let every soul be subject
under the higher powers. For there is no power but of God…
Whosoever therefore resisteth
the power resisteth the ordinance of God…
For rulers are not a terror
to good works, but to evil…
For he is the minister of
God to thee for good…
Render therefore to all
their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom, fear to whom
fear; and honor to whom honor.
[Romans
13:1-7]
This man, accused of being a seditionist, is the man who preaches to them, and
to us today, that we are to be peaceful and law-abiding citizens. And if
we seek to change government, we seek to change it in godly, and prayerful, and
peaceful ways.
All right, the third thing that this orator says about the apostle Paul: “He’s
a ring leader of the sect of the Nazarenes.” Now that’s the truth!
But this orator used it in supreme and sublime contemptuousness. Nazareth
was a despised village, even Nathaniel said: “Can anything come out of Nazareth?”
And when they called the Christians “the sect of the Nazarenes,” they were
doing it in contempt—they are insulting in their words. But he was surely
correct when he said that Paul is a ringleader of the group. He was like
that everywhere he appeared. He had the energy and the strength of seven
men, and he poured his life into that ministry of the gospel.
Then last this Tertullus, this orator, says against Paul: “He’s gone about to
profane the temple.” Now that’s the most astonishing word that I could
conjure up. “He is going about to profane the temple.” He was in
the temple paying a vow before the Lord! Bowing in praise before the
great God Jehovah! And while he was there, he was seized by a riot who
were beating him to death. Yet this Tertullus, in almost hypocritical
mockery, says that he is profaning the temple.
So the procurator, after
listening to the castigation from the Roman orator Tertullus, he says that you
may speak for yourself—and Paul begins. And he says, “I know that thou
hast been a judge of this nation for many years.” Felix was in that office of
procurator longer than any other had been. And he says, “Therefore most
happily do I answer for myself,” and then follows after this word of his good
conscience toward God:
This I confess…, that after
the way they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing the
things that are written in the law and the prophets:
And have hope toward God…
that there shall be a resurrection of the dead…
And therein do I exercise
myself… without offense, and void of offense toward God, and toward men.
[Romans
24:10-16]
Well, after Paul’s defense it was so apparent that he had been unjustly accused
that Felix had no basis to condemn him. So in order to delay the process,
he says to the court and to the accusers: “We will wait, and then when Claudius
Lysias comes, why, I will hear the utmost of the matter.” So he leaves
Paul in bonds.
Now, for the next person that appears in the chapter: “After certain days,” after
Paul has been kept in prison waiting for the coming of the Roman chiliarch,
“After certain days, when Felix came with his wife Drusilla, who was a Jewess,
he sent for Paul and heard him concerning the faith in Christ.” Now, that’s
one of the most unusual developments that you could find in dramatic
story. Drusilla is one of the most beautiful women of her day; she’s one
of the beauties of the world. Drusilla is the youngest daughter of three
of Herod Agrippa I. Herod Agrippa I appears in the twelfth chapter of the
Book of Acts. And he is the Herod Agrippa that kills James, the brother
of John, and he imprisons Simon Peter, expecting to execute him the next
day.
Drusilla is the sister—when we turn to the next chapter, the twenty-fourth and
twenty-fifth chapters of the Book of Acts—Drusilla is the sister of Herod
Agrippa II and Bernice. She is the great granddaughter of Herod the Great,
who slew the babes in Bethlehem, and she is the great niece of Herod Antipas,
who slew John the Baptist.
Well, being a Jewess and married to Felix, she’s a gold digger. She was
married to the king, a little petty king in northwestern Syria. But
because of her great beauty, when Felix found out about her he persuaded her to
leave her husband and to come with [him].
Well
the beautiful girl, she’s just at that time seventeen years of age. Why, she
had an opportunity to be in the court and she was very ambitious to appear in
that circle in society, so she left her husband and came to live with Felix—and
by the way, she had a son by Felix and called him after the name of her father,
Agrippa, and both of them died in the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 A. D—and all
of those artifacts from Pompeii, where Drusilla perished in the eruption, they
are here in Dallas now and all of us ought to go see them.
Well, that’s Drusilla, and being a Jewess, why, she interested her husband
Felix in this man who could tell them about the most wondrous sorcerer who ever
lived: one Jesus. Herod Antipas did that, he was delighted to see Jesus
for he wanted to see him pull some magic; to pull off some miracle for his
entertainment.
So Drusilla and Felix have the persuasion that they can idle away an
interesting hour by listening to this man who apparently is the greatest
proponent of the message of this Christ Jesus of any man in the
world. And they expect to hear some word about this ecclesiastical
Houdini, this scriptural Thurston, this religious Blackstone. And they
are there, just the two of them, to listen to this apostle Paul as he is
supposed to entertain them about the greatest sorcerer and magician they ever
heard of.
Now I want you to tell me: what would you think that Paul would speak about
when he stands in the presence of Felix, the Roman procurator, and Drusilla his
wife? She is a queen, and possibly the most beautiful woman in Roman history.
And Felix himself is one of the richest men in the empire. The ceiling of
his house is gold; the walls are velvet; the carpets are flowered. There’s
no limit to the wine, and they drink it out of golden goblets. He is a quasi-god
and he loves sycophantic adulation. When he walks into the room men stand
up, nor do they dare be seated until, in haughty permissiveness, he allows them
to be at rest and at ease. He’s also a judge; with a nod of his head he
can send a man to the lions. With a gesture of his finger he can send a
man to the stake, and with a word of his mouth he can crucify the
subject. And Paul stands before Felix and before Drusilla; what do you
think he would say? All who ever stood before them bowed in adulation; filled
his ears with words, and phrases, and sentences of sycophantic flattery.
That’s what you would expect.
What
do you think Paul will do as he stands there before that procurator and his
queenly wife? What he did was, the Book says:
And as Paul reasoned of
righteousness, and temperance, and judgment to come, he preached to them the
gospel of the Son of God—Felix trembled, so powerful the Word of God—Go thy
way, he answers, for this time; when I have a convenient season I will hear you
again, I will call for you.
[Acts
24:25]
Did you know that’s one of
the most dramatic things that you can conjure up in mind? How does a lowly
preacher—and this one in bonds and in chains—how does he speak and how does he
say before such an exalted personality; and especially before a man who
commands his life or his death by a word? What do you say?
Let me tell you an incident
exactly like it. In English history, Hugh Latimer is a preacher of the
gospel of the Son of God. And he had preached the Sunday before in the
presence of King Henry VIII, and he had displeased his majesty by the boldness
of his sermon, whereupon King Henry VIII ordered him to preach again on the
following Sunday, and to make apology for the offense he had given. So
the following Sunday comes and Hugh Latimer, God’s preacher, is standing before
the king—King Henry VIII—and
after reading his text, the preacher began his sermon with this word, and I
quote:
Hugh Latimer, dost thou
know before whom thou are this day to speak? To the high and mighty
monarch, the king’s most excellent majesty, who can take away thy life if thou
offendest; therefore, take heed that thou speakest not a word that may
displease.
But then consider well, Hugh Latimer, dost thou not
know from whence thou comest, upon whose message thou are sent? Even by
the great and mighty God who is all present and beholdest all thy ways, and who
is able to cast thy soul into hell. Therefore, take care that thou
deliverest thy message faithfully.
He then proceeded with the
same sermon he had preached the preceding Sunday, only with a lot more
energy. That’s a man of God! If you ever go to Oxford, the University of
Oxford, in England, by all means take time to stand at that magnificent
monument before Balliol College at the University of Oxford. And there
you will see a monument to Hugh Latimer and to Master Ridley, his fellow
preacher; both of them burned at the stake!
Christianity ought to have iron in its blood and steel in its spine. And
to be sycophantic and flattering is not worthy of a man of God; and not worthy
of the Lord who laid down His life for the faith; and not worthy of the
apostles and the martyrs who sealed their witness with their blood. So
the apostle stands here before the two and he preaches the gospel message of
Jesus our Lord. And as he does, Felix trembles.
The next time we preach, we
are going to speak of that reply of Felix: “Not now, some other time.”
And the title of the sermon is Tomorrow Is Too Late. A
convenient time never came and he died, as his wife and as his child, without
God and without hope, and without Christ.
Now, in this last few moments, let me speak of this scene: Paul standing before
the Roman procurator and his queen. As he stood there, and as he
delivered his message, he did it the best that he could. With all of the
acumen, and energy, and zeal, and faith, and commitment of which he was
capable. And he delivered that message to an audience of two.
Somehow we get into the persuasion that we have to have a great throng in order
to preach to. And we have to have lots of people in order to witness
to. Nothing could be further from the truth. The greatest sermon
that was ever delivered on the new birth was delivered by the Lord Jesus to an
audience of one—Nicodemus. The greatest message that was ever delivered
upon the nature of spiritual worship was delivered to an audience of one; and
she, a despised Samaritan woman—a harlot. The greatest message that was
ever delivered, in all time and all creation, was delivered by the Lord Jesus
to an audience of one—to a woman named Martha. “I am the resurrection and
the life. He that believeth in Me shall never die.” [John 11:25]
Anytime we persuade
ourselves that we must have great audiences before we can witness and testify,
we are vainglorious and carnal in our spirit and in our self-adulation.
My brother, anywhere, anytime, to anybody is a good where, and a good time, and
a good body to say something about the Lord Jesus; to lift Him up; to testify to
His wondrous name; and to invite into the faith of the Lord.
If I could describe the Christian religion as any one thing above anything
else, I have always said I would call it the religion, the faith, of “the one
lost sheep” and “the one lost coin” and “the one lost boy.” It’s not
beneath our dignity to take time to tell anybody about the Lord God.
Anybody! Anywhere! Any time that any man will listen! And
that is the apostle Paul: pouring out his heart and life in appeal to these, an
audience of two.
Do you notice another thing
about that preaching hour and that preaching service? Do you notice that
he failed? He didn’t succeed. And we’re not going to succeed,
always, all of the time, “all-wheres”: We’ll not! Our Lord did not. He
said the preaching of the gospel is like a sower, going forth to sow.
Some of it falls by the wayside on hard ground and some of it the birds of the
air pick and carry away; and some of it falls in thorns, and in thistles, and
in briars, but some of it falls on good ground—bears fruit to God. And
the Lord will always see to it that some respond; some will turn, some will
believe, and some will be saved.
When I follow the life of our Lord, He failed with the rich young ruler.
He failed with the scribes and the Pharisees. He failed with the leaders
of the temple. He failed with the national leaders of the people; but God
gave Him some. And God never fails with us: He’ll give us some. And
anytime God would bless me and help me to win just one to the Lord Jesus, God
be praised.